The first day of Manipur’s reinstated free movement policy, implemented on March 8, 2025, witnessed violent clashes, casualties, and mass protests, highlighting the deep ethnic divide in the state. The government’s directive to restore unrestricted movement faced fierce opposition, particularly from tribal communities.
Clashes and Casualties in Kangpokpi
Violence erupted in Kangpokpi district, where security forces clashed with Kuki demonstrators. The conflict resulted in the death of 30-year-old Lalgouthang Singsit, who succumbed to bullet injuries sustained during the protest. Additionally, 25 others, including women, were injured. The unrest broke out as protesters opposed Union Home Minister Amit Shah’s directive, which aimed to restore normalcy in the state.
Attack on Passenger Bus and Road Blockades
A state transport bus traveling from Imphal to Senapati district came under attack in the Gamgiphai area. A mob pelted the vehicle with stones, forcing security personnel to intervene with tear gas and baton charges. Protesters also set fire to private vehicles and burned tires on National Highway 2 (Imphal-Dimapur), disrupting transport.
Weapons Seized and Arrests Made
Authorities took stringent measures to prevent further violence, leading to the recovery of 114 weapons. Security forces also arrested seven individuals allegedly linked to banned outfits operating in the state.
Background of the ‘Free Movement’ Directive
The move to resume free movement across Manipur comes after nearly 18 months of ethnic clashes. Home Minister Amit Shah’s directive instructed security forces to ensure unrestricted travel across the state from March 8. The government promised strict action against those attempting to obstruct this process.
Opposition and Protests by Tribal Groups
The Federation of Civil Society Organisations of Manipur (FOCS), a Meitei group, organized a “March to the Hills” on the same day free movement resumed. This triggered widespread protests from tribal communities, particularly the Kuki-Zo groups, who viewed the march as a direct provocation.
Conclusion
Manipur’s first day of free movement was overshadowed by violence, raising concerns about stability in the state. The events underscore the ongoing ethnic tensions and the need for careful conflict resolution to achieve lasting peace. The government’s next steps in handling the unrest will be crucial in determining the success of this initiative.
